After listening to a couple of recent podcasts by ‘experts’ in crime and psychology, it has become clear that there is still, nine years later, astounding ignorance of the case of the murder of Meredith Kercher. Of course, a recent biased netflix documentary created by long-time Amanda Knox advocates doesn’t help.
The PR talking points, created by the public relations firm hired by Amanda Knox’s father a few days after Amanda’s arrest in 2007, are all being repeated without any research.
The Netflix documentary which was released on September 30, 2016, has proven to be another propaganda piece for the convicted slanderer who escaped justice in the murder of Meredith Kercher. The creators of the film have been advocating for Knox for years while misleading viewers about their slanted view of the case.
Investigative journalists Nick van der Leek and Lisa Wilson hold their magnifying glass over one of the most controversial murder cases in America -the 1996 murder of Jonbenet Ramsey. It has been 20 years since the six-year-old’s lifeless body was discovered in the basement of her home. Van der Leek and Wilson have studied many difficult-to-solve cases and by carefully reconstructing the sequence of events surrounding the crime, with an open but curious mind, they reveal more food for thought into how and why this case unfolded as it did.
On September 12, 2016, Amanda Knox’s ex-boyfriend-of-seven-days decided to give a podcast interview. The show is appropriately called, The Dark Room, where it shines a favorable light on Raffaele Sollecito while keeping the public in the dark about the facts of the Meredith Kercher murder case.
In an obviously rehearsed monologue, Sollecito doesn’t seem to hear the first question before embarking on his rant. The knife-collector recounts his latest rendition of what he supposedly did the night of the murder. The problem is that Sollecito’s new alibi for his activities on the evening of November 1, 2007 contradicts what he told a judge in court back in 2007, shortly after the crime.
” . . .with vampiristic prowess, [Amanda Knox] sucks harder on the fame machine – and has been busy promoting her documentary at the Toronto Film Festival.”
As Amanda Knox’s new documentary is heavily publicized, many mainstream media outlets have been publishing gushing reviews. The only problem with most of these reviews is that they contain many factual errors. Once example is in a review written in Vanity Fair Magazine which misquoted Perugian prosecutor Dr. Mignini. Mignini responded to the inaccuracies on truejustice.org.
Over and over writers are getting the facts wrong about the murder of Meredith Kercher case. The latest pack of lies is courtesy of Kate Leaver She wrote an article titled, “Freeing ‘Foxy Knoxy’: Why People Are So Obsessed with Amanda Knox”
Below is a list of the mistakes she made:
“Knox and Sollecito spent nearly four years in jail in Italy, before their release in 2011 and exoneration by the Supreme Court of Italy in 2015”
Wrong. Knox and Sollecito were acquitted due to insufficient evidence, they were not found innocent of the crime and Knox’s conviction for calunnia was upheld by the Italian Supreme Court. Knox owes Lumumba 10,000 euros in damages which she refuses to pay.
The Italian Supreme Court states in its final verdict that they were forced to acquit Knox and Sollecito because of investigative errors:
On June 27, 2011 Rolling Stone Magazine published an article by Nathaniel Rich titled: The Neverending Nightmare of Amanda Knox The writer did a bad job. It was amateur work: there were false public relations points all over the article, and the writer didn’t even try to be objective. But that wasn’t the worst of it. Thanks to the proliferation of pro-defense propaganda identical to that littered throughout the Rolling Stone article, Meredith Kercher was denied justice.
Nathaniel Rich’s article is lengthy and filled with factual errors. Some parts were well-written, he is a talented writer. However, in this case, he wrote a clearly biased article which contained many inaccuracies. His story was widely circulated by pro-defense supporters. For the sake of brevity, this article will jump to the parts where the most egregious errors and omissions were found.
Rich stated in his article,
“When the prosecutor hypothesizes that the victim was slaughtered during a satanic ritual orgy, you’ve got the crime story of a decade.”
The prosecutor, Dr. Giuliano Mignini, never said that there was a satanic ritual or any type of satanism ever. This was a myth perpetuated by supporters of Amanda Knox in order to turn public opinion against the prosecution. Nowhere in any of the court transcripts interviews, or testimonies, available here, was satanism or witchcraft ever mentioned by the prosecutor. This accusation has been repeated incessantly by various Amanda Knox supporters in an attempt to disparage a well-respected public prosecutor.
Rich then mentions a U.S. senator who questioned whether Knox got a fair trial, referring to Senator Maria Cantwell from WA, hometown of Amanda Knox and her public relations firm Gogerty Marriott.
It is being reported on September 1, 2016 that a 20-year-old woman named Amanda and her two male accomplices strangled a young man to death and dumped his body by the railroad tracks in Scranton, PA. Amanda Wayda, Preston Layfield, 19, and Tyler Mirabelli, 22 are all charged with “aggravated assault and conspiracy charges in the Aug. 25 death of 21-year-old Joshua Rose.”
All of the entries are in! There are 14 excellent photoshops to choose from. Which ones are your favorite?
Choose any TWO photoshops below that you think are the best- don’t forget to click the ‘vote’ button at the bottom! (Results shown after you vote – scroll up to see results so far!)
The Winner will receive a FREE copy of The Manipulative Memoir of Amanda Knox