

When Alex Acosta sat before Congress to explain himself, what unfolded was less an act of accountability and more a masterclass in bureaucratic self-preservation. He painted the 2008 Epstein plea deal as a âstrategic compromise,â claiming a federal trial might have been too risky because victims were âunreliableâ and evidence was âthin.â In reality, federal prosecutors had a mountain of corroborating witness statements, corroborative travel logs, and sworn victim testimonyâyet Acosta gave Epstein the deal of the century. The so-called non-prosecution agreement wasnât justice; it was a backroom surrender, executed in secrecy, without even notifying the victims. When pressed on this, Acosta spun excuses about legal precedent and âjurisdictional confusion,â never once admitting the obvious: his office protected a rich, politically connected predator at the expense of dozens of trafficked girls.Even more damning was Acostaâs insistence that he acted out of pragmatism, not pressure. He denied that anyone âhigher upâ told him to back offâeven though he once told reporters that heâd been informed Epstein âbelonged to intelligence.â Under oath, he downplayed that statement, twisting it into bureaucratic double-speak. He even claimed the deal achieved âsome level of justiceâ because Epstein registered as a sex offenderâa hollow justification that only exposed how insulated from reality he remains. Acosta never showed remorse for the irreparable damage caused by his cowardice. His congressional testimony reeked of moral rot, the same rot that let a billionaire pedophile walk free while survivors were left to pick up the pieces.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Acosta Transcript.pdf - Google DriveBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
When Alex Acosta sat before Congress to explain himself, what unfolded was less an act of accountability and more a masterclass in bureaucratic self-preservation. He painted the 2008 Epstein plea deal as a âstrategic compromise,â claiming a federal trial might have been too risky because victims were âunreliableâ and evidence was âthin.â In reality, federal prosecutors had a mountain of corroborating witness statements, corroborative travel logs, and sworn victim testimonyâyet Acosta gave Epstei...