Diddy Makes His Case to Have His Accusers Hit With A Gag Order

In the case United States v. Combs, 24-cr-542 (AS), Sean Combs' legal team has submitted a formal request to Judge Subramanian to issue an order prohibiting further extrajudicial statements from prospective witnesses and their lawyers. The defense argues that such public comments could undermine Combs' constitutional rights, specifically those outlined under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments, which guarantee due process and a fair trial. The request is made pursuant to Local Rule 23.1, which seeks to limit public commentary that could influence legal proceedings, particularly in high-profile cases like this one.Combs’ attorneys stress that the current media environment, combined with the ongoing public statements by witnesses and their legal representatives, poses a significant risk of prejudicing potential jurors. They contend that these extrajudicial statements could create an environment of bias, making it challenging to secure an impartial jury. By restricting public commentary, the defense aims to ensure that the case proceeds in a fair manner, focusing solely on evidence presented in the courtroom rather than media narratives that could distort the facts or sway public opinion.In this episode, we get a look at that motion.(commercial at 7:42)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.42.0.pdf